Saturday, December 18, 2004

Cornell U. Reports, You Decide

Kudos to The Liberal Realist for this link.
"ITHACA, N.Y. -- In a study to determine how much the public fears terrorism, almost half of respondents polled nationally said they believe the U.S. government should -- in some way -- curtail civil liberties for Muslim Americans, according to a new survey released today (Dec. 17) by Cornell University.

About 27 percent of respondents said that all Muslim Americans should be required to register their location with the federal government, and 26 percent said they think that mosques should be closely monitored by U.S. law enforcement agencies. Twenty-nine percent agreed that undercover law enforcement agents should infiltrate Muslim civic and volunteer organizations, in order to keep tabs on their activities and fund raising. About 22 percent said the federal government should profile citizens as potential threats based on the fact that they are Muslim or have Middle Eastern heritage. In all, about 44 percent said they believe that some curtailment of civil liberties is necessary for Muslim Americans.

Conversely, 48 percent of respondents nationally said they do not believe that civil liberties for Muslim Americans should be restricted. "...
"The survey also showed a correlation between television news-viewing habits, a respondent's fear level and attitudes toward restrictions on civil liberties for all Americans. Respondents who paid a lot of attention to television news were more likely to favor restrictions on civil liberties, such as greater power for the government to monitor the Internet. Respondents who paid less attention to television news were less likely to support such measures. "The more attention paid to television news, the more you fear terrorism, and you are more likely to favor restrictions on civil liberties," says Nisbet."

Do I really need to refer to history, here? How many people does it take to insist on a special mark on the driver's license of a certain ethnic or religious group? How long after that before we put the marked AMERICANS in special housing "for their own safety"?
I'm not saying it's going to happen. I'm asking that it not happen.

3 comments:

achromic said...

Right on. I wonder how many it did take in WW II to put asian americains in camps? right..... or how many did it take for every supposed communist to be placed on a "blacklist". These things happened right here in the good USA. We don't have to build the Warsaw gettos or places like Awshawitz (forgive my bad spelling) to have evil things happen. Slavery and genocide happened here, and was done with the help of our goverment heck with our army, right here. It just isn't really talked about in terms of us doing it. It is seen as those "other" people.

Anonymous said...

Its not just people who appear to be one ethnicity or another, its almost any differences at all. Some friends of mine, all white punks were raided by the FBI snd local Bomb Squad at gun point a year or so ago after one of the neighbors made an anonymous call. They were made to say their SS numbers on video camera and the house was torn apart, finding only a small amount of marijuanna and gross of bottle rockets. Both of which were confiscated. The suspician was that they were selling guns out of the house but the anonymous call brought the search the mourning after a large, loud party, chances are it was a nieghbor who doesn't party much.

Point is, the trouble doesn't need to be as organized as institutionalized bigotry. The signs of an awful misuse of the government's law enforcement is already at hand. Those friends of mine probably should have had their party shut down by the local police but certainly not the friggin FBI.
Which is worse, chaos itself controlling the mighty law enforcement, or directed and efficiant evil?

She Dances in Dragon said...

And that is exactly my point. We are not that far from ghettos and concentration camps. We are already having some children tattle on their parents for unpatriotic behaviour. I do not consider it patriotic to cheerfully support anyone who holds the office of the President of the United States of America. Sorry, ain't gonna happen. Wouldn't be prudent.